Evaluated on 7/10/2025 of post #1
Q1: Name of your Grant
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Descriptive name, easy to tell what this is for.
Q2: Total Grant amount in USD ($)
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Within acceptable range.
Q3: Evaluation Factor – Specific
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Objective is clear, thank you for making this easy to read.
Q4: Evaluation Factor – Measurable
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Measurables are reasonable and clearly laid out.
Q5: Evaluation Factor – Accountable
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Provided 2 forms of contact.
- From Grok: @chuks_dandison , a Nigerian crypto enthusiast and content creator, champions seamless fiat-to-crypto onboarding and community-driven Web3 projects like $SHOUT, believing in accessible, decentralized innovation.Chuks is hyping $EZA and $BANE on @shoutdotfun , urging fans to yap loud and climb the leaderboard for crypto rewards! @chuks_dandison’s recent posts are a high-energy, community-focused push to promote $SHOUT and other tokens ($EZA, $BANE, $ONION) via @shoutdotfun. They leverage motivational language, gamification, and repetitive posting to drive engagement, aligning with their role as a crypto enthusiast advocating for Web3 innovation. However, the aggressive promotion and lack of detailed project insights warrant caution, as unchecked hype can lead to risks for followers. Their strategy is effective for building excitement but could benefit from more transparency to sustain long-term trust.
Q6: Evaluation Factor – Realistic
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. Additional input needed.
- Rationale: I’m unable to approve more article, blog, or video grants in the African region due to multiple grants already approved. Your grant is very well written and structured. If you have another idea that hasn’t been approved, I invite you to give a brief summary of what else you think you could accomplish. No need to resubmit a whole new grant, let’s just discuss in this thread back and forth with one another.
Q7: Evaluation Factor – Timely
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Great plan, if similar grants weren’t already approved then this would be that has a high likelihood of being approved. Apologies for that!
Q8: Evaluation Factor – Disclosure
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. Additional input needed.
- Rationale: Thank you for your disclosure about being a solo creator and learning about SDGP from @Goldenson . Are you associated with any other grant applicant? I see Chuks Davidson quoted on Application #39