I deeply appreciate your responses, Cyril.
Understood, I was asking if in your research you ran across any lessons learned about centralization.
Some of the topics weāve discussed lately includeā¦
So I think I interpret that to mean the strategic guidance mentioned in the Medium article is received from the SC as part of your informal 1-on-1s with them. Correct?
A quick fun example: I have helped to recruit Michael, but he is now the one with authority to approve certain bills, or sign contracts, where Iām not. Itās kind of a chicken and eggs situation, which makes it fascinating to navigate.
That is definitely very fascinating. What led you to knowing Michael was the right choice? (I appreciate the stories and examples youāve responded the past week. Itās been very educational)
This is mentioned in the operation team weekly updates. This will be live in weeks ahead! ā¦ the staking may or may not be available to you, to comply with your local regulation.
Iām VERY excited to hear that itāll be available in the near future. As for the complying with local regulationā¦fair enough. Iām glad to see that you and the team are stepping through that with all due diligence.
for something that represent 2% of the total voting power out there. When designing a project, youād always want to deliver feature that are the least expensive with the maximum of impact first.
Fair. I can appreciate that approach. 
This will be a judgment, from The Sandbox Game on whether the SIP are aligned or not with the DAOās mission and long term viability.
So per your other post, the DAO has custody of the treasury wallets, and now we know that the Sandbox Company has custody of the voting wallet. Understood, thank you for clarifying this. Have they made any comment you can share about why they voted in SIP 11 & 12?
All budget expenses (operation, maintenance, SIPsā¦), when effectively executed on chain, are transparently shared to the community via the dashboard section of the website.
Iām certainly appreciative that the wallets are listed. Iām unable to decipher what the expenses are for in the listed Etherscan and Polygonscan wallets. Whatās the thought behind revealing/not revealing the DAO Admin Team compensation packages?
This is for efficiencyās sake, so we donāt need to ask the community when we need to increase our cloud space, or buy some pencils
This part makes sense to me. I voice no concern about the 1.8M operations budget approved in SIP-3. My concern was that the Medium article seemed to also say that SIP strategy (like review scope by DAO Admin Team) and SIPs increasing quorum also couldnāt be proposed by the DAO. My SIP was moved out of SIP Drafts and cited as a āConstitutional SIPā that only the DAO Admin Team could propose if it decided to. That was concerning to me. Am I misunderstanding? Please let me know if āDAO-centric SIPsā do not apply to these things.