@Geraldine did you get a chance to review my response? Iām unable to find anything on the Constitution requiring a constitutional SIP must be submitted by the DAO Team except that a constitutional SIP must receive two thirds majority YES vote
@DAO my proposal is actually to fix atht eh beginning this ratio SAND/$ to get rid of the varition of the SAND and use only VP/$ requested. The thing is that if you use only SAND and if the SAND price is blowing (eg 2$/SAND) you might have guys that will request 400ā000 $ with only 200ā000 SAND and the quroum will be very low.
I see your point, but because the fact is that the treasury comprises only of SAND and not USD, quorum should also be pegged to that.
Should the day come that, in your example, SAND be worth $2, the impact on the treasury, of asking for $200k(100k SAND disbursed from treasury), will be much lesser than the impact if SAND were to be itās current worth at $0.28, which is 714k SAND disbursed from treasury.
At the end of the day, quorum should be pegged to the dominant currency of the DAOās treasury.
This wonāt hold true if our treasury is in actual fiat USD. If this is the case, as is with some other DAOs, then pegging quorum to USD makes sense.
1 Like
@Lanzer Currently, the DAO team handles drafting operational documents, including constitutional SIPs, based on community input. Our incoming community manager will help streamline communication and improve collaboration between the team and the community.
He soon will be introduced and dedicated moment with the community will happen from October.
1 Like
@Geraldine ā¦I donāt see where it says only the DAO Team can create a "Constitutional SIP. This would be counter-intuitive, and goes against what Cyril said in his appearance on the Decentralized Podcast (33:40 to 35:30) and Sebās tweet recommending the community create a SIP to lower the quorum.
The vote I put in at the beginning of this thread has 74% (of 10 votes) indicating a change is desiredā¦what more community input are you looking for?
1 Like
At the moment, the DAO team is primarily focused on introducing Delegation, which has the potential to address the quorum issue, as also mentioned in the tweet you referenced. We believe itās important to observe the impact of this solution before considering any further changes. Letās wait to see how things develop with Delegation and evaluate its effectiveness.
Thatās fair. I donāt mind watching how delegations help quorum. Would you mind please moving this thread back into the SIP idea subforum, please?
hello @Lanzer , i donā know if youāre talking about this survey (see the screenshot below) but if itās the case, itās a joke, right ?
I donāt understand your questionā¦are you asking if the poll I put in the original post is a joke? A joke of what?
I think what he meant probably was that itās too small a size to consider it a valid poll.
hi @lanzer, sorry if i wasnāt clear enough. I was asking about the " 74% indicating a change is desiredā¦what more community input are you looking for?"
i canāt imagine that you considere 74% of 10 voters as a valuable ācommunity inputā , so yes , i asked if itās a joke, if itās sarcastic or not.
I absolutly not considere your post as a joke, be sure about that, i respect your work, your time , your involvement.
1 Like
Ooooooo. Okay gotcha. Fair point @sebga, right now there are 10 votes. Thatās very small. Itās not nothing, but itās the best I have based on who was willing to share their view. Iāve posted it on Discord, mentioned it in X/Twitter spaces, and waited 2 weeks, so I felt okay using the poll to respond to Geraldine about whether the community can propose a quorum SIP.
I can go back and add ā75% of 10 votesā to ensure that context is captured. I appreciate you pointing that out 
1 Like