I’m not approaching the situation from the Creator’s perspective but from the buyer’s.
I didn’t understand the situation with the copy in this case.
Besides the complex situation I addressed in my post.
I’ve been having a lot of trouble managing purchased NFTs when I don’t know where I put them. Basically, I have to keep searching XP per XP for where I placed the NFT to delete and realocate, and if I changed the name, I really struggle.
This is about the complete disruption of the concept of ownership, GM and website issues, and the difficulty not only in buying multiples copies but also in managing it.
Idk, This is the SIP idea.
I dont undestand how the SIP idea progress. And, the situation about NFTs and their use are not clear yet. So, idk if the curretly rules are the final or temporary.
This SiP Idea is an administrative and business-related matter for The Sandbox regarding to how NFTs are being used. It wouldn’t be appropriate the council and advisors to comment on the idea first?
I believe that, given the circumstances, TSB needs to evaluate the idea before moving forward, because otherwise, it would be unnecessary work and engagement in the progress and continuation of the SIP, as a SIP proposal, as a vote, right?
What you have here is a SIP idea, which is where other SandFam people input on it before the SIP author fills out the SIP template and sends it to the DAO team.
I wouldn’t expect the DAO team to input much on a SIP idea, although sometimes they do.
It’s interesting how you’re active in many platforms not of your concern yet could not answer serious question pointed at you on Creators’ Forum concerning your experience.
Don’t try to change the topic @dankoyy . This is the comment that needs your response as we also think you were cheating the BC. Mind answering questions thrown at you instead of questions you’re not even part of?
