Application #12 Educating and onboarding the web2 community to sandbox gaming

The Sandbox DAO Grant Program OPEN: Community Engagement
1

Application #12

Originally Submitted 5/5/2025 6:04:59

Converted by Lanzer from Google form to Discourse template

Q1 Name of your Grant

Educating and onboarding the web2 community to sandbox gaming

Q2 Total Grant amount in USD ($)

3000

Q3 Evaluation Factor – Specific

With this grant, I’d hope to improve on my game streaming. I have a small discord community where I stream games and one major challenge has been getting a good device for wider reach. If this grant is approved, creating high quality sandbox gaming tutorials would be a lot more easier for me as I’d be able to get a good device and also to give back to the community through some incentivised giveaways. I believe that this will surely onboard more gamers to at least try out sandbox and they’d surely fall in love with the games

Q4 Evaluation Factor – Measurable

  • Enable me get a good device to create high quality contents

-Give back to the community I have and the ones I’d get from the grant

-Collab with bigger game influencers for a wider audience

-I’d also travel to different schools in my country where game events are held to promote sandbox

Q5 Evaluation Factor – Accountable

Primary Contact:
Name: Rambo
X (Twitter): https://x.com/ramboshakvr?t=ygVTapJEvVvLQQGA737msw&s=09
Secondary Contact:
The network Community discord announcement channel

Q6 Evaluation Factor – Realistic

With this grant, I’d be able to properly use sandbox to create high quality contents, appear on in-real-life events in my region, form collabs with other gamers, host onboarding sessions and give out incentives to the community/communities I’m in ensuring that new users get on boarded and sustainable adoption of sandbox would be guaranteed

Q7 Evaluation Factor – Timely

All my plans with the grant should be set in motion immediately grant is given and milestones accomplished before August 30th.

Q8 Evaluation Factor – Disclosure

https://x.com/tnchainhub
[redacted by Lanzer]
[redacted by Lanzer]

2

Evaluated on 16-May-25

  • Score Total: 23 of 40
  • Additional Input Needed? Yes
  • Approved? Not enough information to reach decision.

Q1: Name of your Grant

  • Score 16-May-25: 5 of 5
  • Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
  • Rationale: Good descriptive name

Q2: Total Grant amount in USD ($)

  • Score 16-May-25: 5 of 5
  • Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
  • Rationale: Within acceptable range.

Q3: Evaluation Factor – Specific

  • Score 16-May-25: 3 of 5
  • Decision: Meets intent of the question. Additional input needed.
  • Rationale: Please add numbers to grade your success.

Q4: Evaluation Factor – Measurable

  • Score 16-May-25: 2 of 5
  • Decision: Does not meet intent of the question. Additional input needed.
  • Rationale: Please read and answer the question.

Q5: Evaluation Factor – Accountable

  • Score 16-May-25: 2 of 5
  • Decision: Does not meet intent of the question. Additional input needed.
  • Rationale: Beneficiary is already disclosed for another grant.

Q6: Evaluation Factor – Realistic

  • Score 16-May-25: 2 of 5
  • Decision: Does not meet intent of the question. Additional input needed.
  • Rationale: Does not show how it connects to TSB ecosystem.

Q7: Evaluation Factor – Timely

  • Score 16-May-25: 2 of 5
  • Decision: Does not meet intent of the question. Additional input needed.
  • Rationale: Please read and answer the question.

Q8: Evaluation Factor – Disclosure

  • Score 16-May-25: 2 of 5
  • Decision: Does not meet intent of the question. Additional input needed.
  • Rationale: These beneficiaries have already been disclosed for another grant and the grant is the same as the others.
3

grant-rejected

Application #12 has gone 30 days without response from the grant applicant. It is disapproved.

image
image1747×530 73 KB