Application #18 Web3-Sit Defi Game.

[Lanzer]

Application #18

Originally Submitted 5/5/2025 11:35:46

Converted by Lanzer from Google form to Discourse template

Q1 Name of your Grant

Web3-Sit Defi Game.

Q2 Total Grant amount in USD ($)

2000

Q3 Evaluation Factor – Specific

The goal of this grant is to educate and empower gamers within the Sandbox ecosystem to learn how to build their own in-game experiences. Through interactive workshops and tutorials, participants will learn how to customize avatars, design land plots, and understand the basics of gamification in Web3. The focus is on skill-building and community upliftment, especially for newcomers, helping them become confident creators in the metaverse.

Q4 Evaluation Factor – Measurable

June: Kick-off of awareness campaign and distribution of onboarding resources to attract new participants into The Sandbox ecosystem.

July: Host virtual education sessions and interactive workshops where participants learn to customize avatars, build on land, and interact with smart contracts using Sandbox’s tools.

August: Highlight participant contributions, collect feedback, and compile a report showcasing engagement and learning outcomes.

Q5 Evaluation Factor – Accountable

Primary Contact: SIT (@Soltersea_)

Email: [redacted by Lanzer[

Discord: [redacted by Lanzer]

Secondary Contact: Solomon

Email: [redacted by Lanzer]

Telegram: [redacted by Lanzer]

Q6 Evaluation Factor – Realistic

Web3-Sit Defi Game helps bring new users into the Sandbox ecosystem through charity focused storytelling and gamified education. It will leverage the Sandbox metaverse to simulate real life social impact in a fun, engaging way.

Q7 Evaluation Factor – Timely

June 1–June 15: Development of concept and smart contracts

June 16–July 15: Beta release and community engagement

July 16–August 25: Final version launch, dashboard release, and completion of impact reports

All activities will be completed before August 30, 2025.

Q8 Evaluation Factor – Disclosure

SIT: Founder of Web3-Sit, a blockchain advocate and community builder.

Solomon: Technical co-lead of Web3-Sit, smart contract developer and DeFi strategist.

[Lanzer]

Evaluated on 16-May-25

• Score Total: 29 of 40
• Additional Input Needed? Yes
• Approved? Not enough information to reach decision.

Q1: Name of your Grant

• Score 16-May-25: 5 of 5
• Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
• Rationale: Unique name, nice job

Q2: Total Grant amount in USD ($)

• Score 16-May-25: 5 of 5
• Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
• Rationale: Amount is within acceptable range.

Q3: Evaluation Factor – Specific

• Score 16-May-25: 3 of 5
• Decision: Meets intent of the question. Additional input needed.
• Rationale: The specific word choice for “Customize avatars” and “design land plots” appears to not understand what Game Maker and Vox Edit does. “Understand the basics of gamification in Web3” and “creators within the metaverse” sounds like non-Sandbox specific thing. Please clarify this language to what, precisely, the workshops and tutorials will accomplish within the Sandbox ecosystem.

Q4: Evaluation Factor – Measurable

• Score 16-May-25: 2 of 5
• Decision: Does not intent of the question. Additional input needed.
• Rationale: Please add specific numbers to make it easy to verify that the thresholds were met. Please reread the question and provide %s.

Q5: Evaluation Factor – Accountable

• Score 16-May-25: 5 of 5

Q6: Evaluation Factor – Realistic

• Score 16-May-25: 3 of 5
• Decision: Meets the intent of the question. Additional input needed.
• Rationale: This doesn’t seem realistic enough to impact the Sandbox ecosystem. The Q3 Specific and Q4 Measurable inputs appear to indicate that the authors are not completely familiar with the Sandbox ecosystem. Additionally, “through charity focused storytelling” was not described in other question inputs. Please add this to Q3 Specifics.

Q7: Evaluation Factor – Timely

• Score 16-May-25: 3 of 5
• Decision: Meets the intent of the question. Additional input needed.
• Rationale: “Smart contracts” and “version launch” and “dashboard release” are not consistent with any other question inputs. What smart contracts is this referring to?

Q8: Evaluation Factor – Disclosure

• Score 16-May-25: 3 of 5
• Decision: Meets the intent of the question. Additional input needed.
• Rationale: Please provide links to read about these two beneficiaries.

[sebga]

i realize the amount of work, @Lanzer

[Lanzer]

Oh man…Merci beaucoup @sebga . This is SO much work, but it’s really rewarding and I’m getting a mountain full of experience in governance right now.

[Lanzer]

grant-rejected

Application #18 has gone 30 days without response from the grant applicant and did not answer application as required. It is disapproved.