Evaluated on 6-Jun-2025
Q1: Name of your Grant
- Score: 5 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Great name.
Q2: Total Grant amount in USD ($)
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Within acceptable range.
Q3: Evaluation Factor – Specific
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. Additional input needed.
- Rationale: Intent of the grant is clear. Please input how you will integrate your native language into your content. TSB has an overwhelming majority of English speaking content. We need more community engagement in international languages too.
Q4: Evaluation Factor – Measurable
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. Additional input needed.
- Rationale: Don’t you already have a branded channel on X, YT, TikTok, Telegram? What Preparation is needed?
Q5: Evaluation Factor – Accountable
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Does not meet intent of the question. Additional input needed.
- Rationale: Do you have any other people within your company or group? Please reread what I requested from the question.
- From Grok: @shelleymaeph is a web3 gaming enthusiast and Polkadot ambassador, diving deep into DeFi and onchain projects like Starknet and Somnia, believing in community-driven ecosystems and scalable blockchain solutions. shelleymaeph’s hyping crypto projects like $Novas and $Arbitrum, buzzing about web3 unity and stacking points. @shelleymaeph 's posts on X reflect a strong focus on web3 gaming, DeFi, and the Polkadot ecosystem, with an emphasis on community-driven projects and blockchain interoperability. Below is an analysis of their recent activity based on available data, particularly highlighting the mentioned post about the Artemis update and other relevant themes: Polkadot Ecosystem Enthusiasm, Web3 Gaming and Community Focus, Crypto Project Hype and Token Support, Technical and Ecosystem Insights
Q6: Evaluation Factor – Realistic
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input required.
- Rationale: Makes sense but seems boilerplate. Not sure what “We’re also responding to real user feedback” means.
Q7: Evaluation Factor – Timely
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input required.
- Rationale: Makes sense. Thank you.
Q8: Evaluation Factor – Disclosure
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. Additional input required.
- Rationale: Please explain your telegram group and include a screenshot of their logo + description.