Circular ecosystem using companies and brands free advertising NFTs

đź’ˇ SIP: Ideas
1

How about using companies and brands free advertising NFTs? (For a circular ecosystem)

People who are not familiar with Web3 have no idea about spending money to buy NFTs.

For example, there are many G-SHOCK enthusiasts in the world.

But will they spend money to buy G-SHOCK NFT?

The only Web3-related term they’re familiar with is probably word Bitcoin.

Most of them will not study the functions of metamask, complete the sandbox KYC, open a CEX account, buy SAND, and transfer the money to their own address to buy G-SHOCK NFT.

It is extremely difficult for those who are unfamiliar with Web3 to buy G-SHOCK NFTs.

I used G-SHOCK as an example to make it easier to understand, but the same applies to everything.

The sandbox must be aware of these things and deal with them.
The current situation is far too unfriendly to newcomers.

There are two ways.

One is to issue advertising NFTs for free.

The other is to carefully explain the introduction of the sandbox to newcomers (this can be done by AI or through easy-to-understand diagrams).

The current situation is such that newcomers who are unfamiliar with Web3 cannot enter the sandbox.

This will not help players, creators, or landowners grow.

The current land and sand prices say it all.

There is no excuse.

Sand’s market capitalization ranking has fallen from 50th to below 150th. Land is even worse.

What I want to propose is NFTs for advertising by companies and brands.

Distribute advertising NFTs to them for free.

It would be even better if NFTs had functions, such as invitations, discount coupons, or connections to the real world.

In the sandbox estate, they earn advertising NFTs through, for example, survival games.

The Sandbox provides multiple game templates that companies and brands can use.

Alternatively, creators create games in advance and companies and brands can use them.

New players learn the game with minimal effort and understand the sandbox.
They play the game for free and get free ad NFTs. They realize important NFT features.

And some of these newcomers become skilled players, creators, and landowners.

The Sandbox receives royalties from companies and brands, and the creators of the games receive a fee.

The ecosystem cycle begins, starting with free NFTs.

Fee paid by companies and brands

65% The Sandbox
30% Me
5% DAO

If there is a referral

Fee paid by companies and brands

60% The Sandbox
30% Me
5% DAO
5% Referrer

1 Like
2

Didn’t you already post something about this G-shock example, @XiaoLong ?

I just want to make sure we don’t have duplicate ideas here….

Note to @Delegates : I’ve moved this from :speech_balloon: General to :light_bulb: SIP: Ideas sine Little Bird is offering an actionable idea here (even if it does need an executable plan put in place first).

Thoughts from others?

2 Likes
3

This is also a good idea.

If we evolve to a system where revenue is shared based on the effectiveness of the experience, leveraging advertising NFT…

But there are more serious issues that remain…

I think a game maker that can create fun experiences should come first.

2 Likes
4

Don’t forget, Shont: we have different pots of funds for different kinds of ecosystem improvements.

We can push multiple ideas at once :flexed_biceps:t4:

GM is priority for some.
LANDs are priority for others.
Different topics are most important for others.

3 Likes
5

What do you get? You’re outside the ecosystem? No one’s paying you for this idea? Are you just a nice guy?

1 Like
6

What I’m saying isn’t negative.

The Sandbox Game Maker currently specializes in social features.

The social aspect is even more pronounced than the game aspect.

What I’m saying is that game making requires corresponding changes.

In conclusion, it seems to be changing. :flexed_biceps:

2 Likes
7

It’s a brilliant idea that can be implemented with little effort.

2 Likes
8

DAO participants are here to offer ideas on how to improve a game and ecosystem that we all love. We don’t all get paid for every idea we have. But if a proposal includes a funding request to do some kind of work on behalf of the ecosystem, then financial disbursements are considered by the community at large (including yourself!).

Also, the author of this post (and you) are NOT outside the ecosystem…

: ) Here you are!

If you hold any SAND or LAND, you’re a member of the DAO.

1 Like
9

Democracy and capitalism have a strong affinity. This is a historical trend.

If this proposal is successful.

The sandbox gets a fee and players.

Players have the fun of playing in the sandbox and get NFTs that have real-world value.

Creators get a fee.

Companies and brands get customers.

This is a good ecosystem.

Excellent!

What does the proposer get?

The proposer just wastes time and strains his or her brain.

Only the proposer is not get reward.

Is the proposer the only one outside of this economic system?

No money, no status, no honor.

Is this the future of democracy, the DAO?

No one questions this?

1 Like
10

Thanks for sharing your perspective — this is an important discussion for any DAO community.

A few thoughts to clarify:

  1. Community respect and recognition – Proposers are a lot like people who bring ideas to a city council meeting. Even if the proposal doesn’t directly result in a personal reward, there’s real value in the recognition and respect earned from contributing ideas that move the community forward.

  2. Opportunities for grants – If a proposer’s idea requires their time, expertise, or effort to bring it to life, they’re absolutely able to design the proposal so that they themselves (or their team) are compensated through a grant. Many of our SIPs and initiatives already work this way.

  3. Legacy and influence – Proposals don’t just exist in isolation. Good ideas can shape long-term strategy, inspire future proposals, or even evolve into funded initiatives. That’s impact that lasts beyond one vote.

  4. Network and credibility – Active proposers often find they build strong reputations and relationships that open doors to collaboration with other community members, creators, and even external partners.

That said, your concern about “what if someone contributes ideas without seeking a grant — how should that be rewarded?” is a great one. Do you have an idea for a system that acknowledges and incentivizes that type of contribution? We’d love to hear your thoughts on what an ideal outcome might look like.

Your feedback helps shape how our DAO evolves, so thanks again for raising it.

11

This is the first time I posted here

Tnx

1 Like
12

Thank you for your support!

I want to make this happen

1 Like
13

Thank you, thank you.
I’ve thought of a way to earn rewards.

I’d like to receive a portion of the payments companies and brands make to The Sandbox.

Fee paid by companies and brands

65% The Sandbox
30% Me
5% DAO

If there is a referral

Fee paid by companies and brands

60% The Sandbox
30% Me
5% DAO
5% Referrer

Add the above to the proposal.

I cannot accept a reduction in my fee.

I have suffered huge losses from my investment in The Sandbox so far.

I need to make a profit from The Sandbox for my wife and children.

14

Thank you. !

It’s my favorite way to achieve big results with little effort.

1 Like
15

That’s right!
I have to earn money for my wife and kids.
My losses on The Sandbox so far have been huge.
I’ll get my lost money back on The Sandbox.

For my wife and kids!!

1 Like
16

Even if the idea is good, doing these things for someone/companies unfamiliar with web3 won’t change the outcome.

For example, you need a wallet address to send NFTs.

The user needs to create a wallet from a system like Metamask and connect it to TSB. They need to know about NFTs. And, of course, they need to know how to use the web3 ecosystem.

If they can already do these things, they are active in web3.

And we must not forget: what will be the characteristics of NFTs? Where will they be used? etc. Today, 80% of companies in the world do not or cannot accept payments in crypto.

In short, even if the idea is good, I don’t think it will achieve any success in implementation.

1 Like
17

Your opinion is excellent.

It faces reality head-on.

And it’s similar to my top statement.

I used G-Shock as an example to make it easier to understand.

If you’d like, please read the top statement again.

First, they benefit from free NFTs.

Then they learn Web3.

And then the sandbox slowly permeates society.

This is the future.

As mentioned in the top statement, the only word they know is probably “bitcoin.”

Compared to traditional assets like gold, bonds, and stocks, bitcoin is a very new asset.

According to AI, NFTs will be:

2020s: Dawn

2030s: General public begins to use them

2040s: Permeated society

Looking at blockchain technology as a whole, it’s estimated that 40% of finance will be blockchain technology by the 2040s.

Now, at the dawn of the 2020s, I believe it would be extremely meaningful for the general public to start using NFTs through the sandbox.

1 Like