I’m Lanzer, Elected Domain Allocator (DA) for Sandbox DAO Grants Program (SGDP).
Looking to submit a grant application for the Community Engagement & Charity domain per SIPs 25 & 27?
Follow this!
Section A >>> Click for what the Community Engagement & Charity domain is
- Per SandboxDAO.com SIP Guidelines website: this budget is about promoting charitable and socially responsible initiatives that use the platform and its resources for positive impact .
- A quick way to fund small, impactful projects in The Sandbox ecosystem
- Optional Reading: How to Apply for a Grant
Section B >>> Click here for how to submit a Grant Application
**Click “New Discussion” in this subforum
Fill in your answers for each Q#, shown below
Ensure that each of these questions have an answer:
- Q1 Name of your Grant
- Q2 Total Grant amount in USD ($)
- Q3 Evaluation Factor – Specific
- Q4 Evaluation Factor – Measurable
- Q5 Evaluation Factor – Accountable
- Q6 Evaluation Factor – Realistic
- Q7 Evaluation Factor – Timely
- Q8 Evaluation Factor – Disclosure
Section C >>> Click here for step-by-step instructions on answering
- Q1: Enter the name you want your Grant to be known as.
- Q2: Enter your grant request in USD ($). The amount of your USD milestone will be converted into SAND at the time payment is due and you will be paid in SAND
https://coinmarketcap.com/converter/. Anything over 3K USD is allowed and will face higher scrutiny per Project Diversity metric of SIP-25 - Q3: Include specific outcomes (end result) for this grant. Lanzer will be answering: Is it obvious what this grant wants to achieve? Is this grant explained in a way that doesn’t require additional context outside of this grant application?
- Q4: Include 3 measurable milestones that track progress toward the grant outcomes. with recommended payment %s that total to 100%.
Lanzer will be answering: Does this grant have at LEAST 3 milestones? (There is no penalty for only 3) Do these milestones make sense? Are the grant outcomes distributed evenly across these milestones? Do the recommended payment %s per milestone all total to 100%? - Q5: Provide a primary and secondary PUBLIC point of contact for this grant. There is no need for email. Lanzer will be answering: Was a primary and secondary contact listed? Can one or both of these contacts be reasonably thought of as owning the success or failure of the grant?
- Q6: Define the realistic impact of your grant outcomes on the Sandbox ecosystem. Lanzer will be answering: Do these impacts make sense for the Sandbox ecosystem? Do any of these impacts connect with the people, product, or purpose of the Sandbox (timestamp 29:54 to 31:00) OR does the grant author clearly explain how it reasonably connects to the Sandbox ecosystem in a way not covered by the linked video? (Impacts not covered will receive increased scrutiny during evaluation)
- Q7: Describe the timeline for completion of the grant outcomes. Lanzer will be answering: Do the grant outcomes fully complete before the SGDP program end of August 30th? Is the timeline clearly laid out and easy to connect with the measurable milestones?
- Q8: Fully disclose those who benefit from your grant. Include a link to read about them, how they benefit, and the group/business/entity they are associated with or belong to. Lanzer will be answering: Are the disclosed persons findable on X, LinkedIn, or other websites where Lanzer can read about them? Is it clear what group/business/entity these disclosed names associate with or belong to? Is it clear how the disclosed persons/groups will benefit (monetarily, DAO voting power, etc)?
Section D >>> Click for Scoring & Evaluation of your Questions
Each Question will receive a Score , Decision , and Rationale .
Scores from 0 to 5 are an overall assessment of Decision and Rationale.
- 0 = No input was provided. Provide input as question requires.
- 1 to 2 = Input provided doesn’t meet intent of question and needs additional input. Read the Decision and Rationale before resubmitting.
- 3 to 4 = Input provided meets intent of question and may need additional input. Read the Decision and Rationale to see if additional input is needed.
- 5 = Input provided meets intent of question and no additional input is needed. Great job!
Decision states if inputs provided meet the intent of the question and if additional input is needed.
Rationale gives deeper insight into the assessment of the decision and gives an indication of what is expected to meet the intent of the question.
Click for the Budget & Published Evaluations
I will publish evaluation notices and budget updates in this thread! Please feel free to discuss!
Looking forward to growing the Sandbox ecosystem with you!
Lanzer copy/paste scoring
Evaluated on
Q1: Name of your Grant
- Score:
- Decision:
- Rationale:
Q2: Total Grant amount in USD ($)
- Score:
- Decision:
- Rationale:
Q3: Evaluation Factor – Specific
- Score:
- Decision:
- Rationale:
Q4: Evaluation Factor – Measurable
- Score:
- Decision:
- Rationale:
Q5: Evaluation Factor – Accountable
- Score:
- Decision:
- Rationale:
Q6: Evaluation Factor – Realistic
- Score:
- Decision:
- Rationale:
Q7: Evaluation Factor – Timely
- Score:
- Decision:
- Rationale:
Q8: Evaluation Factor – Disclosure
- Score:
- Decision:
- Rationale:
and repost 
!
