Hello @sebga it is % engagement (voters / members). So in the case of ENS: 89039 voters/140K members = 64%.
Happy new year everybody!
Hello @sebga it is % engagement (voters / members). So in the case of ENS: 89039 voters/140K members = 64%.
Happy new year everybody!
Hello, @Cyril I was going to ask you where the 89039 (ENS) are in the table, I don’t understand the calculation but whatever, it’s not really essential.
Thank you, Happy new year to you too
I was gonna ask the same thing @sebga & @Cyril . TSB’s DAObase.ai page shows 209K token holders and 2.6K voters.
GM all!
First off a happy new year to everybody! Then a quick update to get us back in the rhythm:
Some additionnal detail on the immediate priorities:
And last but not least, 2 other hot topics:
I wish you all a great start of the week!
Cheers
Cyril
Hey @Cyril I have 2 questions regarding this. There’s been questions brought up as to whether Yobike will be paying out for its Red Cross event, would you have an answer to that? Nobody knows what exactly is going on.
2nd thing, Yobike managed to launch SIP-18, with a Neutral recommendation from SC, all while being in liquidation. Why are they allowed to launch that SIP and why was the SC recommendation Neutral instead of Negative knowing that the company is closing?
It’ll look pretty bad on the DAO if we had approved that SIP knowing that the company is closing.
Thanks!
Hello Cyril, Happy new year to you as well
Thanks for the update, a few questions please:
My first time reading about the SLA, my bad… will there be an SIP for the SLA contract for more info as well as the budget ?
I believe the UGC website proposal is delayed, could you share the latest status update on it ?
Personally, I feel it may not be ready for a vote just yet.
I share the same concerns and thoughts as the @DAO regarding the Yobike situation. In addition to his questions, would it be possible to compile some form of lessons learned, data or if possible a summary of the final investigation? I think this could really help us with the SIP selection process and voting.
I think we dodged a bullet by not approving SIP-18!
Cheers!
Hello @DAO and @DrMetaverso !
About Yobike: for the price pool that have been given so far, they are all on a wallet managed by Yobike. The agreement we have with them is that the reward will start to be distributed to the winners, after the end of the last event, the 3rd of Feb. This was designed like this to allow for a maximum of people the ability to purchase the NFTs.
TSB account manager is meeting the CEO this week, and we have contacted Yobike on the DAO side too, to get some confirmation in writting on how the situation is going to be handled on their end.
Here is some info about the wallet (you can clearly see our payments)
About the SIP-18, we have been made aware of the situation after the fact, and TSB was not aware neither. As a mather of fact this has been brought to our attention by a fellow community member @KCL (shout out to him! ).
Yobike having passed the KYB a couple of months prior, we did not bother to check again. Something to keep in mind for the future.
re the SLA with Sandbox, this is not a SIP, this is a service provider contract, out of the operation budget. We have other contract of the same nature to maitain the front end of the DAO website for example. The benefit of having a service agreement with the Sandbox directly is speed of execution, knowledge of the context, the asset, etc etc. It’s a no brainer!
cheers