I understand your reserve, I invite you to look up Artprice, Deloitte, UBS, and ArtTactic reports on the subject some explore market dynamic especially the sections focusing on the millennial demographic art vs luxury item consumption habit for a broader understanding. Additionally If you look up sotheby’s and christies performance report you’ll see that their revenue on their luxury/collectible oriented department are the main pain point in their terrible performance of 2024..
Unfortunately producing such infographic on this particular claim is not feasible at this moment when I’m factoring the other missions that I’m currently involved with, in any cases the Scope of work of the mission in itself include the formalisation of the strategic analysis and implementation plan.
All I’m offering at this stage is the guidance of someone deeply embedded in both the traditional and digital art markets, born and raised in the world of art collecting, later managing collections in the traditional space before transitioning fully into Web3 while having a decade of involvement in the implementation of blockchain system in the art world. As the former Head of NFTs at Sotheby’s Paris, a curator of numerous exhibitions at major art fairs and Web3 events, and an early collector in the NFT space, I’ve spent the past five years navigating this evolving market firsthand. My reputation and career is a testimony of my success in this field. My objective is not only to steward the DAO’s portfolio but to grow its influence in the digital art space.
More importantly, I do not propose to act without structure. My approach is to apply the same disciplined portfolio management principles used in high-value traditional art collections: strategic weighting across blue-chip assets, mid-tier projects, and liquid reserves to balance exposure and maintain financial agility for the DAO.
I understand that trust must be earned and that there must be accountability system implemented that’s why we have included, regular performance reporting, and an oversight framework to ensure full transparency.. If it would bring further confidence, I’d be willing to debate all those aspect in a recorded interview, so we can go through all the concern you might have to express on behalf of the people whom delegate their VP to you. How does that sound ?
Otherwise I think this interview with @Lanzer touch upon all those point :
I totally get that idea of delegating/giving mandate to a group of individuals is challenging to have coexist in a decentralized autonomous organisation framework, however I have been the only one willing to propose any project in order to address those issue, beyond the vesting of the strategy i think the broader question this SIP ask is “ do we want to have this NFT collection actively manage or should we just let it be ?”