SIP-28: Creator-Driven Phygital Merchandise Collection

I voted yes.

This SIP’s impact on TSB ecosystem is uncertain, however the $60K budget makes this a low-risk effort and it expands into the physical realm of merchandise, which opens up a new market for TSB ecosystem.

2 Likes

thanks for the confidence! we will make the best to engage more user and creators possible

2 Likes

I have voted in favor of SIP-28. I appreciate your discussion on this and look forward to seeing you succeed in this endeavor!

2 Likes

appreciate the vote of confidence @Money, we look forward to create amazing and immersive experience also outside The Sandbox platform with our phygital products!

2 Likes

NOTICE:

Admin just used Wallet 0x90D0…83Ba with 3.7M VP to vote “abstain” on SIP-28.

REASON:

2M of this VP should have been in @batmann’s control as a new delegate. However, we missed the cutoff on Snapshot to transfer that VP. So, in order to reach quorum, that wallet was activated.

6 Likes

Sounds good! Thanks for update!

1 Like

Congrats @Another-1. looking forward to see your team working on that.

2 Likes

Thanks for disclosing this Kunta. A+

1 Like

thank you for the explanation

1 Like

Well, that was an unexpected last-minute turn of events for this SIP.

A very close vote that came down to the final moments and ultimate this SIP did NOT PASS.

@Another-1 – Don’t be discouraged from resubmitting the SIP in a few months with some adjustments that you feel may win you the votes you’ll need.

1 Like

Well yes unexpected outome here. Did not check that voting was open till 9 Am CET today. Will pay attention to that next time before sending congrats.

2 Likes

Man that’s a bummer to see. I was hoping this one would pass. It was not a high risk to our budget and could’ve opened up new possibilities.

3 Likes

Sorry to see this not pass. Appreciate the effort and hope you will resubmit in the future.

3 Likes