I voted yes.
This SIP’s impact on TSB ecosystem is uncertain, however the $60K budget makes this a low-risk effort and it expands into the physical realm of merchandise, which opens up a new market for TSB ecosystem.
I voted yes.
This SIP’s impact on TSB ecosystem is uncertain, however the $60K budget makes this a low-risk effort and it expands into the physical realm of merchandise, which opens up a new market for TSB ecosystem.
thanks for the confidence! we will make the best to engage more user and creators possible
I have voted in favor of SIP-28. I appreciate your discussion on this and look forward to seeing you succeed in this endeavor!
appreciate the vote of confidence @Money, we look forward to create amazing and immersive experience also outside The Sandbox platform with our phygital products!
NOTICE:
Admin just used Wallet 0x90D0…83Ba with 3.7M VP to vote “abstain” on SIP-28.
REASON:
2M of this VP should have been in @batmann’s control as a new delegate. However, we missed the cutoff on Snapshot to transfer that VP. So, in order to reach quorum, that wallet was activated.
Sounds good! Thanks for update!
Congrats @Another-1. looking forward to see your team working on that.
Thanks for disclosing this Kunta. A+
thank you for the explanation
Well, that was an unexpected last-minute turn of events for this SIP.
A very close vote that came down to the final moments and ultimate this SIP did NOT PASS.
@Another-1 – Don’t be discouraged from resubmitting the SIP in a few months with some adjustments that you feel may win you the votes you’ll need.
Well yes unexpected outome here. Did not check that voting was open till 9 Am CET today. Will pay attention to that next time before sending congrats.
Man that’s a bummer to see. I was hoping this one would pass. It was not a high risk to our budget and could’ve opened up new possibilities.
Sorry to see this not pass. Appreciate the effort and hope you will resubmit in the future.