I propose to introduce a integrity rating system for event organizers, where the promised and fulfilled conditions will be compared. Based on this system, provide a voting system for further admission of the organizer to holding events, or for its rejection.
Bona fide organizers - additional benefits, unscrupulous organizers - fulfillment of pre-event guarantees through the DAO fund, or any penalties, or rejection of the event.
I propose to implement a rating system, because… I, as a player, was faced with the dishonesty of the organizer “Entanglement”. Some of his promises were not kept. Accordingly, some part of the Sandbox community remained dissatisfied. And they have no one to even turn to for this to be noticed. Now they can have such a chance by contacting us at DAO.
Additionally, such organizers can seriously and quietly damage Sandbox’s reputation.
Yes, this doesn’t happen often, but there are facts.
I support this, Schilka!
How would you measure the organizers? What factors would you list for the integrity rating system to judge?
Hi, it took some time)
Yes, in this case the assessment of good faith can be built on the basis of comparing the available (initial) information and the actual (after the event).
I want to add that I actually did not specifically plan to design a real proposal here. I just presented some idea because of a separate case. But if someone else paid attention to it, then it makes sense to work on it more closely. I probably won’t be able to respond and act too quickly, since there is time not only for this.
So I can present at the moment a draft version of certain DAO requirements for collecting basic information about the event…
“can be built on the basis of comparing the available (initial) information and the actual (after the event).”
Can you give me an example of what this looks like please?
Information required by The Sandbox DAO to hold an event (draft).
-
This information is submitted for review and discussion by The Sandbox DAO community.
-
The requirements below are a draft example, idea and proposal, and may be subject to adjustment by the DAO.
-
Some requirements are already met by organizers, and are presented here for the sake of information integrity.
-
These requirements may not apply to experiments.
-
These requirements may apply to new event organizers and to organizers who have complaints from The Sandbox community, without affecting verified organizers with a positive reputation.
-
If possible, information from the organizer should be received in advance, preferably several days (e.g. 3 days), so that more of the community has time to review the information and make the right decisions.
Let’s go!
Information required by The Sandbox DAO to hold an event (draft)
1) Official event start date (provided in the DAO + Publicly on the event page);
2) official event end date (DAO + Public);
3) avatar mint date and terms (if any) (DAO + Public):
- free mint (date);
- allow list mint (date);
- public mint (date);
4) minimum requirements to guarantee receipt of any reward (DAO + Public);
5) reward distribution / mailing date (if any)
6) additional bonus and secret events and drops (this information can be kept secret and not to be respond);
7) game type (single, multiplayer) (DAO + Public);
8) method of completing quests and tasks (single, coop, team) (DAO + Public);
9) difficulty (DAO + Public):
- easy (run and collect items only inside the location);
- standard (includes easy, solve puzzles, talk and choose the correct answers inside the location);
- hard (includes standard + quests that require:
- additional or special knowledge;
- searching for information on third-party resources, including those not related to The Sandbox;
- one solution, for which you need to play in several locations in search of the necessary information;
- work of a whole team);
10) guarantees to the community (in what form are they provided or not provided) (DAO);
-
- in the future, the above points can be presented in comparative tables to determine the status of good faith and honesty.*
11) event’s check list (DAO) (*the example included) (can be presented in the form of a table or in a string format, requiring confirmation by responsible DAO members, ordinary members of the DAO community - optional).
o – EVENT STARTED + DATE
o – FREE MINT (IF ANY) + DATE
o – ALLOW LIST MINT (IF ANY) + DATE
o – PUBLIC MINT (IF ANY) + DATE
o – EVENT ENDED + DATE
o – REWARDS SENT (IF ANY) + DATE
o – REWARDS RECEIVED (IF ANY) + DATE
So the idea is to apply a weighted number to each of these variables, and it’ll calculate a single rating? Or are each of these their own rating?
Thank you for the leading question.
Yes, for example, each indicator can be assigned performance points with a “+” sign (for positive implementation) and with a “-” sign (for negative implementation, or for non-implementation). The starting point is “0”.
Point system (for example):
Items 1, 2, 3, 5. Date:
- Deviation from date: 1 day “-” 1 point;
- Coincidence with the deadline: “+” 1 point;
- Cancellation of the event (deception): “-” 10 points;
Item 4. Minimum requirements:
- Overstating requirements (deception): “-” 5 points;
- Understating requirements: “+” 0 point;
- Coincidence of requirements: “+” 1 point;
Item 5. Distribution of rewards:
- Rewards distributed and sent: “+” 10 points;
- Rewards not distributed / not sent (fraud): “-” 10 points;
Item 6. Additional events and secret drops:
- 1 event: “+” 1 point;
- 1 drop: “+” 1 point;
Item 7. Game type:
- Match: “+” 1 point;
- Mismatch: “-” 1 point;
Item 8. Method of completing quests and tasks:
- Match: “+” 1 point;
- Mismatch (deception): “-” 3 points;
Item 9. Difficulty:
- Match: “+” 1 point;
- Mismatch (increased difficulty):
- to standard: “-” 1 point;
- to difficult (deception / fraud): “-” 10 points;
Item 10. Guarantees:
- given or presented: “+” 5 points (maybe + some badge);
- not given or not presented: “-” 1 point.
It is also possible to set the maximum rating value: max = 100 points.
In the future, it is possible to display the organizer’s event history.
Gotcha, yeah that makes sense. Nice writeup Schilka!