Evaluated on 7/9/2025 of Post #15
Q1: Name of your Grant
- Score: 5 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Grant name is short with an easy-to-understand description.
Q2: Total Grant amount in USD ($)
- Score: 5 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Great price for the value provided.
Q3: Evaluation Factor – Specific
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. Additional input needed.
- Rationale: Please insert language from post #9 about interviewing Sandbox builders. Please insert that you will post the interviews in Sandbox discord #tsb-influencers-content-showcase, here in TSB DAO discord, and add to your X post
@theSandboxGame @theSandboxDAO @TSBCreators #TheSandboxDAO #TheSandboxGame
Q4: Evaluation Factor – Measurable
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Milestones are clear and percentages are reasonable.
Q5: Evaluation Factor – Accountable
- Score: 2 of 5
- Decision: Does not meet intent of the question. Additional input needed.
- Rationale: X account for @ekson_wtb doesn’t work. See screenshot below. Please provide a second form of contact.
Q6: Evaluation Factor – Realistic
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Thank you for the discussion to ensure that impact was relevant to our ecosystem.
Q7: Evaluation Factor – Timely
- Score: 4 of 5
- Decision: Meets intent of the question. No additional input needed.
- Rationale: Will conclude before Aug 29th.
Q8: Evaluation Factor – Disclosure
- Score: 3 of 5
- Decision: Does not meet intent of the question. Additional input needed.
- Rationale: Please explain how you are associated with Vic and if you are associated with any other grant applicant.