SIP-36: LAND Estate Sales

:right_arrow: Vote Now

TL;DR

What In order to solve the current issue of LAND owners only being able to transact individual pieces of LAND estates, we are proposing to implement a solution based on GBM’s already existing bid-to-earn auction system.
Why This will meet a long-identified need(discussion here) of the community and permit more flexibility in options for selling LAND and facilitate different kinds of transactions.
How An approximate 8 week development program plus completion of a security audit. Existing technology will be leveraged.
When Q1 2026
Who GBM have developed several projects successfully with The Sandbox before and have proven themselves as a partner through running several successful auctions, the technology for which they are able to leverage to expedite delivery here. They continue to work with The Sandbox and so this supports aligned deliverables. They also have extensive experience in the broader Web3 space.

Council Recommandation

Neutral

SIP Details

Problem Description

There is currently no mechanism to permit LAND owners to sell LAND in estates. They can currently only sell individual units of LAND without any sort of bundling.

Solution Proposed

This Scope of Work outlines the development of a third party solution for secondary sales with integrated functionality for bundling LAND assets natively. This has been something your community has requested so they can trade their estates. The goal is to create a seamless and user-friendly experience within the existing GBM x The Sandbox dApp, ensuring scalability, performance, and maintainability.

The GBM team will handle the entire build and deployment, and the project is forecasted to take 8 weeks of total development time. Based on availability and technical requirements, we are therefore planning delivery in Q1 2026. We have estimated the cost to be $60,000.

Deliverables Of Final Product

  • The Sandbox users will be able to access the existing GBM x The Sandbox dApp, where a new “Secondary Marketplace” tab will be added. This unified interface will allow all traffic to be directed through one destination, enabling the primary auctions and secondary markets to complement and support each other.
  • Users will be able to list individual 1x1 LANDs directly on the secondary marketplace.
  • For estate listings, users will have the ability to bundle multiple LANDs natively within the dApp before putting them up for sale. This will enable the trustless, single-transaction sale of estates - solving a key limitation of the current system.
  • The bundling tool will be designed to only allow LANDs from the same estate to be grouped. If a user attempts to bundle unrelated LANDs, the system will display an explanatory error message and prevent the action.
  • Given that there is no official estate API, the GBM team will make its own custom solution to detect if lands are part of an estate.
  • The system will automatically generate an image and metadata to represent each bundle from on-chain available data, using templates pre-approved by The Sandbox. Users will also be able to include custom descriptions for their listings.
  • Users will be able to sell their 1x1 or bundled estates via one of three methods:
  • Private Sale: The seller will specify a price and generate a private sale link. Only the designated buyer’s wallet will be able to see the sale and complete the transaction.
  • Direct Sale: The seller will list their asset for a fixed price on the public marketplace, where any verified user can purchase it.
  • GBM Auction: The seller will initiate a GBM Bid-to-Earn auction. Verified users will be able to place bids using SAND, and outbid participants will earn SAND rewards. The assets will be placed in escrow during the auction by the GBM system.
  • All three sales methods will be executed atomically, ensuring that the buyer receives the asset and the seller is paid -or the transaction fails. This will eliminate the need for any trusted intermediaries.
  • All transactions on the marketplace will be conducted in SAND.
  • The Sandbox and The Sandbox DAO will receive a predefined transaction fee from each sale from the seller, automatically distributed to their respective whitelisted wallets. GBM will also get its fee at point of sale. The provisional breakdown is outlined below:
    • GBM - 2%
    • The Sandbox - 2.5%
    • The Sandbox DAO - 2.5%
  • The entire marketplace, including the bundling feature, will be fully self-service.

Benefit to The Sandbox Ecosystem

This will provide significant benefit to LAND owners in permitting them to transact more freely with their LAND and with the ability to bundle and sell estates in a trusted and robust manner.

It also provides some income to the DAO via the transaction fees.

Risk Assessment Mitigation
Transaction Security As there will be on-chain transactions being conducted via this marketplace, this carries risk of fraudulent transactions or security breaches. There will be security checks performed at the point of transaction. Additionally, a security audit of smart contracts will be undertaken to ensure that the correct baseline is set.
Appropriate Bundling As Estates are a construct within the Sandbox and do not exist on-chain, there is a risk that bundled LAND that are not estates could be sold as estates. The data for estates will be validated based on public Sandbox data to ensure that all bundles packaged as estates are estates.
Ongoing Management The service will require ongoing maintenance and sustaining, especially if there are regulatory changes. GBM will provide support for free for the first 12 months. Following that, support arrangements may need to be determined if the fees generated are not sufficient to sustain.

Budget requested

Overall cost: $60,000

Milestones How do we measure success? Expected completion date Unlock Payment
#1 Project plan Documented plan and timelines. Wireframes of the solution Q4 2025 $13,500
#2 Development of Bundle Software Smart contracts for bundling LAND completed. Frontend and backend development. Accurate image data generation Q1 2026 $13,500
#3 Integration into GBM x TSB Marketplace Integrate bundling natively into GBM dApp user flow. Smart contract integration. Allowing for private sales, direct sales and GBM auctions. **Includes:**1 year guaranteed maintenance. Free hosting for 1 year; continued support if fees sustain costs Q1 2026 $20,000
#4 Estate validation Tool to ensure that Land is appropriately bundled as Estates. Q1 2026 $3,000
#5 Security Audit External audit report covering all required Smart contracts Q1 2026 $10,000

Team/Author Background

GBM have an established relationship with the Sandbox and has already completed 3 successful auction events, selling hundreds of assets, with each getting bigger then the last and netting more revenues for The Sandbox. Outside of this GBM has completed over 80,000 auctions without any issues and is working with notable web3 projects such as Decentraland, Unstoppable Domains and Aavegotchi just to name a few. The founders are fully doxxed and have been working in the blockchain space since 2018, whilst being involved as early as 2013.

Hugo McDonaugh, CEO - Hugo McDonaugh - GBM | LinkedIn

Edouard Bessire, COO - Edouard Bessire - GBM | LinkedIn

Guillaume Gonnaud, CTO - Guillaume Gonnaud - Cryptograph, MyNFT, gbm.auction | LinkedIn

Voting Options

Yes, No, Abstain

2 Likes

Let’s kick the discussion off for this SIP, @Delegates, @domainallocators, and community at large!

2 Likes

Hi there,
This is a great solution for certain landowners with estates, enabling them to package their land sales. The technical question is: must the landowner combine the land into a bundle by swapping NFTs for new ones?

3 Likes

WOW~~!

  1. Solves a Core Problem: It enables the atomic, one-click sale of entire LAND Estates, which is currently impossible. This will significantly boost asset liquidity and value.

  2. Trusted Team & Clear Plan: The project will be handled by GBM, a proven partner with a successful track record with The Sandbox. They’ve presented a reasonable budget ($60,000) and clear milestones.

  3. Drives Ecosystem Value: The 2.5% transaction fee directed to the DAO creates a sustainable revenue stream that will fund future community initiatives.

  4. Ensures Security: A full security audit of the smart contracts is part of the plan, ensuring a safe and secure trading environment.

This is a win-win-win for LAND owners, The Sandbox, and the DAO.

4 Likes

Great idea.

But will landowners pay 7%?

1 Like

I support this SIP!

The Metaverse Street Journal Team will back this SIP.

2 Likes

The selling party would pay the fees.

The Sandbox and The Sandbox DAO would receive a predefined transaction fee from each sale from the seller, automatically distributed to their respective whitelisted wallets. GBM will also get its fee at point of sale.

The provisional (as of yet unconfirmed) breakdown is:

  • GBM - 2%
  • The Sandbox - 2.5%
  • The Sandbox DAO - 2.5%
1 Like

Nice, seems like this fills a core need for landowners.

7% seems pretty high to me. How did they arrive at 2-2.5-2.5 versus 1-1.5-1.5 or something else?

3 Likes

Idea suggestion

  1. Concept: To stimulate market activity, the total transaction fee is lowered to 6.5%. A strong 2% burn mechanism is preserved, with the reduction in total fees coming from the shares of the GBM and The Sandbox DAO.
  2. Final Fee Structure:
    • GBM: 1.5%

    • The Sandbox DAO: 1.5%

    • The Sandbox (Revenue): 1.5%

    • SAND Burn: 2.0%

    • Total: 6.5%

@Delegates @theKuntaMC

2 Likes

Thank you for your reply.

We want to ask you about 7%.

What is the basis for 7%?

Land owners who want to sell their estate have lots of lands , about dozen to hundreds.

Would they prefer a 7% cost?

For example, opensea’s cost is 1%.

Will market forces work and they choose OpenSea?

1 Like

Thank you for the idea and as land onwer I am greatly in favor of it. I will vote for it but their must be clear rational behind the fees that seems a bit high to me.

Few questions:

@shont can you just explain what is a SAND burn?

@Paul and GBM team: why Sandbox should receive a fee on secondary market transaction? And even so 2% is very high.

As for other SIP I would suggest that the DAO is first fully reimbursed from the 60 k costs before the split of fees is happening (excepting maybe for fees that are required by GBM to cover the maintenance costs)

2 Likes

Just an idea.

I agree that the fees need to be revised.

1 Like

For anyone who may not be familiar with the term “burn”….

Burning a crypto token is the process of permanently removing a specific number of tokens from circulation. This is done by sending the tokens to an inaccessible digital wallet known as a “burn address,” making them irretrievable

That’s what I thought but was wondering why would you willing to do that. The main reason do this is to reduce amount of sand in circulation. Putting this mechanism in place will just benefit the big holder of sand instead of increasing its usage and liquidity.

Hi All,

We have been monitoring the discussion here and it is clear that there are concerns about the fees, which had been a fairly hot topic of discussion while we were curating this SIP.

This week we have been working with GBM & The Sandbox, and we have been able to get agreement to update the SIP with the following breakdown prior to posting it for voting:

  • The Sandbox - 1.5%
  • The Sandbox DAO - 1.5%
  • GBM - 2%
  • Total - 5%

We believe that this represents a fair amendment based on the feedback while still ensuring that the tool is viable and sustainable. These figures will need to be reviewed based on actual performance once the tool is live which may trigger amendments.

While this may not fully satisfy everyone’s expectations, we know that you all appreciate that the DAO does not exist in a vacuum, and there are commercial realities that we have to operate within. The fees are just one aspect of this SIP, which provides a pragmatic opportunity to have a desirable feature delivered in a favourable timeline for a very reasonable cost by a well-respected company with a highly credible track record with The Sandbox. It also lays a foundation for potential improvements in future.

It has been great to see all the thoughtful comments and suggestions, as well as the dedication to ensuring the best outcome for the DAO, so please keep it up!

Cheers,

Paul

5 Likes

Not everyone will be satisfied, but this is something that needs to be done quickly.

I’m personally satisfied.

I recommended Estate LAND to a friend. I recommended this feature because it was difficult to find a way to purchase it

:flexed_biceps: DAO :flexed_biceps:

2 Likes

This is a good start. We can monitor both the usage and viability for a couple of months.

2 Likes

Yeah, I fully support. Nothing wrong with each party earning some revenue, including the DAO.

7% was steep from my perspective. I appreciate the discussion that led to TSB and TSB DAO reducing their % to 1.5 each.

:slight_smile:

2 Likes

I will be supporting this SIP regardless of the answer, but may I confirm, will these be win-win auctions - where when you get outbid you receive the difference? And if so who is paying for that?

Similar to TSB Training Grounds GBM Sale?

3 Likes

We’ve got @Paul looking into this a bit further to come back to us with an accurate answer!

1 Like