✅ VoxBridge: A Lightweight Toolkit to Use Sandbox Assets Across Platforms

[Geraldine]

After a full review of the project deliverables record and feedback exchanges. Here is the summary of the exchanges for more clarity:

June 13	Milestones deliverables agreed	3 milestones defined
July 10	start date	after KYC being completed.
July 28	DA reminder about program end	“The pilot of The Sandbox DAO Grant Program ends on August 31st. Please submit your final milestone at least 5 days before that date.”
August 2nd	Grantee submission	Team declares all 3 milestones “completed” and requests review.
August 11	DA review #1	Feedback provided after review, Milestone 1 not validated due to technical issues (converter not importing correctly into Unity/Roblox).
August 18	Correction #1 submitted	Grantee sends revised files.
August 25	DA review #2	Milestone 1 rejected again. DA warns: “This is the second time M1 has been rejected. Please address all feedback; otherwise, I will cancel the grant.”
August 26	Grantee follow-up	Team sends additional information to fix M1.
September 6	DA review #3	Still not working. DA says: “I will give you a last chance, guys.”
September 6	Grantee request	Team asks for a call to discuss issues.
September 18	DA validates M1	Milestone 1 validated. But, Milestone 2 not validated due to texture issues caused by size reduction.
September 22	Grantee correction #2	Grantee reports issue fixed for M2 and submits final report.
September 26	DA review #4 and cancellation	DA notes textures fixed but animations removed, invalidating performance results. Grant canceled for missed extented deadlines and unvalidated deliverables.
October 11	Grantee follow-up	Reports that the issue is now fixed, after the project’s cancellation and program closure.

@DappsoverApps

Was it explicitly stated in any agreement that we will get our grant canceled at a stated date or time?

DA holds the discretion to review and validate milestones based on their technical expertise. The admin team does not override or influence these evaluations. The DA’s decision to cancel the grant was made in accordance with standard grant procedures and within the scope of their delegated authority.

–

@DappsoverApps

these corrections were add-ons to the project and they were not explicitly stated in our proposed deliverable but we understood they were nice to have and we made the corrections.

The corrections requested by the DA were not “add-ons” or optional improvements, they directly concerned the core deliverables (e.g., successful import of .glTF/.glb files into Unity and Roblox, accurate texture and animation handling). These were explicitly listed as part of the milestone deliverables.

–

@DappsoverApps

We never had any hard deadline that we were suppose to follow so we can not just get a project we completed canceled because the domain allocator feels like.

A milestone is considered “completed” only once it has been reviewed and validated by the DA. Submitting files does not constitute completion if the deliverables fail to meet the agreed requirements.

Hope this clarify.
Best