SIP-11: The Sandbox DAO to Fund the Sandbox Ambassador Program

Why did the Sandbox vote again?

Let’s see from Snapshot.Org how DAO’s are being managed and what’s the current meta:

  • ApeDAO: Yuga doesn’t vote.
  • MocaDAO: Animoca Brands doesn’t vote.
  • ENS: Team doesn’t vote.
  • Aave: Team doesn’t vote.
  • Lido Finance: Team doesnt vote.
  • SandboxDAO: Sandbox vote and help SIP’s achieve quorum.

My question is, the Special Council and Advisory boards are OK with Sandbox voting on SIP’s?

Reason for posting this here is: Give me a reason to keep voting if Sandbox will interfere with the voting process.

PS: I’m genuinely expecting an official response/statement from anyone on the Advisory Board or Special Council.

2 Likes

This is great?!?! Maybe? I like this!
An idea stemming from the situation, where we turn tragedies into opportunities.

I believe that if the Council gives a positive evaluation to a SIP, they should automatically abstain from voting on that SIP. This way, the quorum would be automatically secured whenever the Council gives a positive evaluation.

The value of SAND reflects the investment made in the token, which is directly influenced by The Sandbox’s efforts to increase its worth. The Sandbox team can do whatever they want with the SAND they own.

This way, the Council ensures quorum for everything it deems positive, while still leaving room for the community to approve or not, a SIP even without the TSB’s vote. This could potentially provide a strategic advantage for the community, ensuring quorum when there is a positive evaluation from the TSB staff.

Look the SIP-12 :point_down:

Following this logic and consistency, this is why the TSB also abstained from voting on @markbagogames SIP-12?? We just need to confirm if this was indeed the official directive and if this approach will continue moving forward.

I am not shocked by the fact that sandbox votes “abstain”, this allows us to reach the quorum without influencing the vote.
Concerning yuga and other things, I didn’t understand what was being highlighted.

I start to be seriously concerned about the way TSB is engaging with the community… It was very clear from more than a week now that the quorum would not be reached. When it was mentioned by some person of the community that quorum was difficult to get the answer from TSB was always that this to make sure the voting is protected… bla-bla-bla… and that the DAO was working to find mechanism to get easier quorum. Good idea to try to find a mechanism but why would you vote like that at the last minute whithout pre-informing the community about your plans?
After the shitty AMA now we have this…
Guys can you connect your neurons?

If the votes don’t pass because of the quorum, it’s a shame all the same. Well I admit that it suited me on the “NFT collection” SIP.
We also need to move forward, let’s see how things evolve.

sorry @Geraldine to bore you, where are the SIP 11 & 12 to vote ?
I can’t find nowhere, no link.
It’s not the first time i struggle to find the way to vote. It’s not really intuitive, i’m sure i’m not the only one to have this issue but i feel so stupid.

Hi @sebga,
Here are the links to vote: Snapshot
I also update the community here in annoucement: :ballot_box: SIP Batch 5: Voting

1 Like

thank you very much Geraldine,
if we could have a tab dedicated to active sips that would be good, I really searched everywhere without finding anything, I remembered my favorites and I was able to find the snapshot link but it’s not ergonomic at all .
just a suggestion, thanks again for your response.

you can also delete this out-topic message, no drama, i garanted :sweat_smile:

image

While you’re here discussing this, one of The Sandbox’s best studios quit because they couldn’t see a future… I just wanted you to know x.com

Oh gosh darnet… That’s not a good sign.